Wolff concludes that even if Nozick no doubt endorses the latter view, he cannot determine a single value theory of libertarian rights by claiming that people ought to have the opportunity to lead meaningful lives. In the latter case libertarian rights seem more appropriate. In the former case we need welfare rights. It depends on whether we mean 'best chance of leading a meaningful life' or 'chance to lead the most meaningful life'. To be able to lead a self-shaping life, Nozick claims that we need libertarian rights.Įven if Nozick is right in that a meaningful life is a self-shaping one, although there are different opinions on this matter, it is not clear that libertarian rights are the most appropriate. According to Wolff, Nozick means by a 'meaningful life' a 'self-shaping life'. Why? Because people are capable of leading meaningful lives, argues Nozick. Individuals are to be seen as ends, not merely as means. More important, since Locke's foundation for rights the preservation of mankind, would generate positive rights to survival, Nozick could not accept Locke's argument. Locke rests his argument on the Bible, and that possibility is not open to Nozick. What grounds does Nozick have for this claim? He cannot gain support from Locke on this matter, Wolff argues. Libertarian rights are also presented as natural. Wolff points out that so far Nozick's rights theory is just one among many, and requires further argument. Nozick supports this claim by saying that rights can only be of a negative character, they are side-constraints and exhaustive. To start with, Wolff examines Nozick's claim that certain rights are inviolable that they can never be overridden. Third, Nozick's entitlement theory rejects any state more extensive than the nightwatchman or the minimal state. Second, he argues that a state could evolve without violating anyone's rights. First, Nozick agrees with the individual anarchist that there are strong rights to life, liberty and property. Nozick's philosophy consists of three main parts. Wolff begins by giving a short but accurate account of the ideas in Anarchy, State and Utopia. In addition, he wants to show that Nozick founds his philosophy not on liberty, as one might expect, but on absolute property rights. Wolff intends to subject all important parts of Nozick's philosophy to a rigorous examination, in order to see if it is well-founded and coherent. Occupy a dominating place in political philosophy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |